Thu. Feb 2nd, 2023

This is part 1 of a multipart series of articles regarding proposed anti-gambling legislation. In this short article I discuss the proposed legislation, what the politicians say it will, some facts about the current state of online gambling, and what the bills really propose.

The legislators want to protect us from something, or are they? Everything seems only a little confusing to state the least.

The House, and the Senate, are yet again considering the matter of “Online Gambling” ;.Bills have now been submitted by Congressmen Goodlatte and Leach, and also by Senator Kyl.

The bill being put forward by Rep. Goodlatte has got the stated intention of updating the Wire Act to outlaw all kinds of online gambling, to create it illegal for a gambling business to simply accept credit and electronic transfers, and to force ISPs and Common Carriers to block usage of gambling related sites at the request of law enforcement.

Just like does Rep. Goodlatte, Sen. Kyl, in his bill, Prohibition on Funding of Unlawful Internet Gambling, helps it be illegal for gambling businesses to simply accept bank cards, electronic transfers, checks and other forms of payment, but his bill does not address the placement of bets.

The bill submitted by Rep. Leach, The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, is basically a copy of the bill submitted by Sen. Kyl. It centers on preventing gambling businesses from accepting bank cards, electronic transfers, checks, and other payments, and like the Kyl bill makes no changes from what is currently legal.

Based on Rep. Goodlatte “While gambling is currently illegal in the United States unless regulated by the states, the development of the Internet has made gambling easily accessible. It’s common for illegal gambling businesses to use freely until police finds and stops them.”

In fact, American courts have determined that the Wire Act makes only Sports Betting illegal, and even then only across telephone lines. Very few states have laws that make online gambling illegal, some states and Tribes have taken steps to legalize online gambling, and even the Federal government recognizes some kinds of online gambling to be legal.메이저사이트

Goodlatte himself says his bill “cracks down on illegal gambling by updating the Wire Act to cover all kinds of interstate gambling and account fully for new technologies. Under current federal law, it’s unclear whether utilizing the Internet to use a gambling business is illegal” ;.

Goodlatte’s bill however does not “cover all kinds of interstate gambling” as he claims, but rather carves out exemptions for several kinds of online gambling such as state lotteries, bets on horse racing, and fantasy sports. Even then, his modifications to the Wire Act do not make online gambling illegal, they ensure it is illegal for a gambling business to simply accept online bets the place where a person risks something of value “upon the end result of a contest of others, a sporting event, or even a game predominantly susceptible to chance”, except needless to say when it is a state lottery, horse race, fantasy sports, or among added situations.

The truth of the situation is that a lot of online gambling businesses have located in other countries specifically to avoid the gray area that is the current state of online gambling in the US. Consequently, there’s little that police can do to enforce these laws. Trying to really make the laws tougher, and providing for stiffer penalties, won’t cause them to become simpler to enforce.

As well, most, if not absolutely all, banks and credit card companies will not transfer money to an on line gambling business now, consequently of pressure from the federal government. Consequently, alternative payment systems sprang up to fill the void.

Senator Kyl is equally misleading in his statements. From his proposed bill, “Internet gambling is primarily funded through personal usage of payment system instruments, bank cards, and wire transfers.” But even as we already know, most bank cards in the U.S. refuse attempts to fund a gambling account.

Also from the Kyl bill, “Internet gambling is a growing reason for debt collection problems for insured depository institutions and the consumer credit industry.” If the credit card companies and other financial institutions in the U.S aren’t allowing the funding of gambling, how can it be “a growing reason for debt collection problems” ;.And since when do we need legislation for the financial industry to protect itself from high risk debt. If the financial industry was accepting gambling debts and these gambling charges were an issue for them, wouldn’t they just stop accepting them?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *